07 Jul Is the EPA getting rid of Seresto collars
No, the EPA is not getting rid of Seresto collars.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for evaluating new products and determining the health claims to be made about them. The EPA has evaluated Seresto flea & tick collars and determined that they are safe when used as directed on pets according to their product label. The agency has reviewed scientific data showing that exposure to high concentrations of the active ingredients in the Seresto collar could be harmful, but this exposure only occurs at much higher levels than those experienced by pets wearing the collar.
Overall, the EPA’s evaluation concluded that use of Seresto collars does not pose unreasonable risks to humans or animals when used according to directions on the product label. As such, there are currently no plans for the EPA to get rid of Seresto collars.
What are Seresto collars?
The EPA is currently in the process of reviewing the safety of Seresto flea and tick collars, which are produced by Bayer Animal Health. The review was initiated in response to the thousands of complaints from pet owners who claim that their pets became ill or died after wearing the collar. The EPA is testing samples from several hundred Seresto collars and reviewing customer reports to determine whether they pose a risk to animals.
If the EPA finds evidence pointing to potential risks associated with Seresto collars, it could decide to reduce or prohibit their use on pets. It seresto website may also require additional safety measures, such as labeling and warnings, or impose stricter manufacturing processes and regulations. The review process is expected to take several months before any decisions are made on the future of Seresto collars.
How do they work?
Seresto collars are a flea and tick prevention product designed to protect your pet from parasitic infestations for up to 8 months. The collar features two active ingredients–imidacloprid and flumethrin–that work together to help address both adult fleas and ticks, as well as larva from hatching eggs. As your pet moves, the active ingredients spread onto their fur, offering continuous protection against pests.
The Seresto collar is highly effective, killing existing fleas within 24 hours of its being put on your pet, while preventing new infestations. It’s also waterproof, so you don’t need to worry about it getting damaged or having to change it out after a bath! Plus, since it’s odorless and non-greasy, you don’t have to worry about strong smells or annoying residues around the house.
What are the potential risks associated with their use?
The potential risks associated with the use of Seresto collars are significant. Because these collars use an active ingredient called imidacloprid that can be toxic to aquatic life, birds, and other animals if over-exposed, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is evaluating their safety. Research suggests that long-term exposure to the pesticide in these collars could pose a risk to pets and wildlife, as well as non-target organisms such as bees, butterflies, and ladybugs.
Moreover, since it is not known how much time a pet needs to wear a collar for protection against fleas and ticks, there is always the possibility of constant exposure of larger amounts of pesticides through contact with skin or fur while wearing the collar. This could potentially cause side effects such as hair loss, allergic reactions or rashes on your pet’s skin. Also existing studies show human health risks associated with long term exposure to some pet products containing organophosphate pesticide chemicals including Seresto collars.
It is important to note that EPA evaluation of Seresto collars is still ongoing and it may take several years before any decisions are made regarding their use or elimination from the market.
While the EPA has recently announced plans to discontinue the sale, distribution, and use of Seresto collars, pet owners should be aware of all potential risks associated with using them as a flea and tick deterrent at home. There are other options available on the market that could potentially provide better protection than these products.